顯示包含「ISO 15189」標籤的文章。顯示所有文章
顯示包含「ISO 15189」標籤的文章。顯示所有文章

2017年6月2日星期五

HKAS Seminar on Common Findings related to Management Requirements for Medical Testing Laboratories

The Seminar named "Common Findings related to Management Requirements for Medical Testing Laboratories" was organized by the Hong Kong Accreditation Service (HKAS) on 2 Jun 2017.  Ms. Bella Ho (Senior Accreditation Officer, HKAS) hold the open forum and then Dr. Alex Chan (Accreditation Officer, HKAS) was the speaker for discussing the assessment findings.


2016年10月12日星期三

HKCTC Seminar on Professional Integrity in Testing and Certification

The Hong Kong Council for Testing and Certification (HKCTC) and Hong Kong Accreditation Service (HKAS) co-organized a seminar entitled “Accreditation for Medical Laboratory – The Road Towards Quality and Competence” on 12 Oct 2016.  Medical laboratories provide essential support to the medical sector.  Accurate and reliable laboratory services are crucial for proper clinical diagnosis and treatment.  It is important for medical laboratories in Hong Kong to obtain formal recognition of their testing competence and standard through laboratory accreditation.  The seminar aims to introduce the medical testing accreditation and share the experience of obtaining accreditation and its benefits. 


The first speaker was Ms. Bella Ho (Senior Accreditation Officer, HKAS) and her topic entitled “Accreditation Service for Medical Laboratories”. She said the first launch of HOKLAS based on ISO 15189 was on 16 Feb 2004.  Before that accreditation was employed ISO 17025 included NATA.  The ISO 15198 Particular requirement for quality and competence of medical laboratories was published in Dec 2003. 


2016年9月9日星期五

HOKLAS Assessment Feedback Seminar for Medical Testing Laboratory 2016

The Seminar named "Assessment Feedback Seminar under the HOKLAS for Medical Testing Laboratories" was organized by the Hong Kong Accreditation Service (HKAS) on 9 Sep 2016.  Ms. Bella Ho (Senior Accreditation Officer, HKAS) gave an introduction of the seminar. Dr. Alex Chan (Accreditation Officer, HKAS) was the speaker for discussing the assessment feedback.


It covered two parts.  The first part was selected assessment findings from Mar to Aug 2016.  In this period, there were 19 laboratories to be assessed.  And the second part was feedback from laboratories.  The distribution of assessment findings were summarized as following pie chart. 


2013年6月12日星期三

HKAS First Assessment Feedback Seminar for MedLab under ISO 15189

The Seminar named "First Assessment Feedback Seminar under the HOKLAS for Medical Testing Laboratories" was organized by the Hong Kong Accreditation Service (HKAS) on 11 Jun 2013.

Ms. Bella Ho (Senior Accreditation Officer, HKAS) gave an introduction of the seminar. She said the seminar was focused on the NC statement on ISO 15189 new requirement, feedback from laboratories and assessors, and continuous improvement. The NC harmonization seminar would be arranged at the end of 2013.


The speaker was Dr. Alex Chan (Accreditation Officer, HKAS) and his topic entitled "Discussion on feedback & Presentation on previous assessment findings".


It covered the findings from the assessments since 1 Jan 2013. The following topics would be discussed:
1. Overview of assessment findings reported;
2. Selected observations for discussion or clarification;
3. Requirements that laboraties may not be fully aware of.
The overall of assessments was shown in the following diagram.


A) Feedback from Labs and Assessors:
Case 1: Two identical blood grouping auto-analysers gave a final blood group and antibody screen positive or negative. Do it need additional correlation studies of the digitised parameters? During the discussion, it agreed that no need to make correlation of qualitative results by using digitised parameters (except quantitative results).

Case 2: Lab required to quote the source of the acceptable limits of performance for method comparison (e.g. The Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia (RCPA)). The acceptable limits of performance was discussed to be set based on your laboratory situation. 

Case 3: Assessor would like to have a collective understanding on the acceptance criteria for the method validation or verification, review correlation study, IQC and EQAP, etc. It would be discussed in the next harmonisation workshop.

Case 4: An autoanalyser with two detection channels (i.e. Can detect signals from two different reaction cells simultaneously). Do it need to perform correlation study between these two detection channels for the same assay?
During the discussion, both need and no need opinions were obtained. It needed to considered (1) fix for the purpose and (2) continuous improvement. It was also instrument dependence. If two detection channels were not separated, only using IQC and EQAP were enough. If two detection channels were separated, it needed to perform correlation study based on sensitivity concern.

Case 5: The use of stem cell. HKAS replied that the accreditation service had not expanded to stem cell yet.


B) Observations from previous assessments
1. Storage of items in refrigerators - Clinical sample vs reagent
HOKLAS 015 (4th Edition) 5.2.6 Accommodation and environmental conditions (Key words: Incompatible activities; to prevent cross-contamination);
HOKLAS 015 (5th Edition) 5.2.6 Facility maintenance and environment conditions (Key words: Incompatible activities; to prevent cross-contamination); 5.2.3 Storage facilities (Key words: Clinical samples and materials; to prevent cross-contamination)
Note: Eventhough blood sample is clean and reagent is clean, it could be cross-contaminated if they mixed.

2. Storage of items in refrigerators - Blood Product vs Drugs/reagents
HOKLAS 015 (4th Edition) 5.2.6 Accommodation and environmental conditions (Key words: Incompatible activities; to prevent cross-contamination);
HOKLAS 015 (5th Edition) 5.2.6 Facility maintenance and environment conditions (Key words: Incompatible activities; to prevent cross-contamination)
Note: The concept of effective separation to prevent cross-contamination such as separate refrigerators, items well labelled and compartmentalised.

3. Guidelines for statistical analyses
Precision, Linearity, method comparison and inter-instrument comparison were recommended to analyse and interpret the data with appropriate sources of reference.
Note: Laboratory could set criteria and document the justification of such statistical analyses using lab professional judgement.

4. Blood returning record
HOKLAS 015 (4th Edition) 5.3.12 (Key words: safe handing, transport, storage and use of equipment; prevent its contamination or deterioration);
HOKLAS 015 (5th Edition) 5.3.13 (Key words: safe handing, transport, storage and use of equipment; prevent its contamination or deterioration)
Note: Suitability of the returned blood products for transfusion is an important issue (e.g. Within 30min). It should be Major NC if not fulfilled the requirement.

5. Decontamination of biosafety cabinets (BSCs)
A disinfectant cleaner and 75% alcohol were used to decontaminated the BSCs once per month or on the day just after PM.
HOKLAS 015 (4th Edition) 5.3.7 (Key words: to decontaminate equipment prior to service, repair or decommissioning);
HOKLAS 015 (5th Edition) 5.3.1.5 Equipment Maintenance and Repair (Key words: to decontaminate equipment prior to service, repair or decommissioning; provide suitable space for repairs and appropriate PPE)
During the discussion, some lab decontaminate the BSCs per 3 month and before PM. The frequency of PM depended on the usage. The decontamination (e.g. Fumigation) should be performed prior to every PM (e.g. Access to potentially contaminated parts, carrying out filter penetration tests, after a spillage where inaccessible surfaces, etc.) (Reference: BS 5726:Part 4:1992 - 4.2 Fumigation).
Note: Adequately protected from biohazards; Justification and proof on the effectiveness of the decontamination procedures should be kept.

6. Functional check of autopipettes
HOKLAS Supplementary Criteria No. 2 recommended to verify autopipettes once every three months.
HOKLAS 015 (4th Edition) 5.3.2 (Key words: Equipment shall be shown to be capable of achieving the performance required);
HOKLAS 015 (5th Edition) 5.3.1.2 (Key words: capable of achieving the necessary performance)
According to Harmonisation Workshop for Microbiology on 1 Nov 2012, justification and objective evidence were needed to prove the performance of the autopipettes were satisfactory. For less frequent verification because of its infrequent use, lab should provide evidence. However, the extension was restricted to the same brand/model of pipette with similar routine frequency of use shown by the evidence.
Note: Key point was without justification.

7. Calibration labels on autopipettes
HOKLAS 015 (4th Edition) 5.3.2 (Key words: Equipment shall be shown to be capable of achieving the performance required);
HOKLAS 015 (5th Edition) 5.3.1.2 (Key words: capable of achieving the necessary performance)
Note: If calibration or performance verification is done and the problem is just out-dated label, this would only be a "Recommendation".

8. Evaluation of Euroimmune Analyser I
HOKLAS 015 (4th Edition) 5.5.2 (Key words: Only validate procedures for confirming the examination procedures are suitable for the intended use; The validations shall be as extensive as are necessary);
HOKLAS 015 (5th Edition) 5.5.1.2 (Key words: performance claims for the examination procedure have been met; relevant to the intended use of the examination results)
Note: If the test is qualitative in nature, and there are a sufficient number of positive/negative/borderline samples covered in the evaluation, the LOD determination may not be necessary depending on the intended use of the test.

9. Quality Control for coagulation
QC materials frozen which is against manufacturer's recommendation such as 2C to 8C.
HOKLAS 015 (4th Edition) 5.3.2 (Key words: capable of achieving the performance required);
HOKLAS 015 (5th Edition) 5.3.2.2 (Key words: store received reagents and consumables according to manufacturer's specifications.)
Note: Lab needs to provide evaluation data to support the rationale of freezing the aliquots.

10. Quality Control of Hematoxylin and Eosin staining (H&E staining)
HOKLAS 015 (4th Edition) 5.6.1 (Key words: verify the attainment of the intended quality of results);
HOKLAS 015 (5th Edition) 5.6.2.1 (Key words: verify the attainment of the intended quality of results)
Note: Daily QC of H&E staining is suboptimal. Alternative reference material showing different cellular staining pattens.

11. Sterilisation of Container
HOKLAS 015 (4th Edition) 5.3.2 (Key words: Equipment shall be shown to be capable of achieving the performance required);
HOKLAS 015 (5th Edition) 5.3.1.2 (Key words: capable of achieving the necessary performance)
Note: The media will be subjected to sterilisation after being made up. Therefore, a clean container, not necessarily sterilised should be used for media preparation.

12. Use of accreditation symbol
The new symbols have to be used for all new documents starting from 1 November 2010.

13. Fumigation Frequency
The fumigation of BSCs in the TB laboratory was found to be performed every three monts.
Note: No international standard or consensus on fumigation frequency was found. It depended on actual workload and examination procedures undertaken by the laboratory. For safety, the level of formalin shall be monitored after fumigation (ceiling limit of 0.3ppm recommended by the Labour Department).

14. Internal Audits
It was found the IA did not cover any new tests.
HKAS SC No.5 - Internal Audit and Management Reviews - 5.8 when organization seek extension of accreditation, the management should ensure audits are carried out and corrective actions are taken before the HKAS on-site assessment.

15. Elements covered in Code of Conduct document
HKAS SC No.6 - Code of Conduct 2.2(k) should be considered
2.2(k) - Procedures for reporting suspected violation and established mechanism for the prompt and fair adjudication of alleged violations

16. Records of the ingredients of in-house media
In-house media means media to be made up by weighing each specified component in the formula.
HOKLAS SC No.27 5.5.6 - Records shall be kept of the preparation details for all types of media including: (f) Media ingredients, manufacturer, manufacturer's batch number and quantity of each component
Note: No need to record provided that (i) the media are made in accordance with the formula give in the SOP; and (ii) Both positive and negative controls available to evaluate the performance of the in-house media after it's been made.
HOKLAS 015 (5th Edition) 5.3.2.3 Reagents and consumables - Acceptance testing (Key words: Consumables that can affect the quality of examinations shall be verified)
Note: Culture media are considered as consumables.

17. Source of Eggs for Lowenstein-Jensen Medium Preparation
It used for culture of mycobacteria such as Mycobacterium tuberculosis.
Note: a known source allowed traceability in case the eggs appeared to have problems. It belongs to supplier management.

Reference:
HKAS - http://www.itc.gov.hk/en/quality/hkas/about.htm

2013年4月1日星期一

HKAS Seminar of the Transition Arrangement ISO 15189_2012

The Seminar named "The Transition Arrangement to the New Edition of the International Standard ISO 15189:2012 Medical Laboratory - Requirement for Quality and Competence" was organized by the Hong Kong Accreditation Service (HKAS) on 27 March 2013.

The first speaker was Dr. Alex Chan (Accreditation Officer, HKAS) and his topic entitled "Implementation Schedule for HOKLAS 015 (5th Edition)".


From 16 April 2013, all reassessment, assessments for extension of accreditation and surveillance visits could be based on either the requirement of the 4th edition or 5th edition of HOKLAS 015. From 1 October 2014, assessments will only be based on HOKLAS 015, 5th edition. During the transition, obvious non-conformities against the NEW requirements of the 5th edition (ISO 15189:2012) will be raised as "Recommendations". The overall schedule is shown as follow diagram.


The second speaker was Ms. Bella Ho (Senior Accreditation Officer, HKAS) and her topic named "Comparison of ISO 15189:2007 and ISO 15189:2012".


The ISO 15189:2012 requirement list was showed and the red colour topics were minor change or different wordings and the blue colour topics were new requirements.


Some change of requirements were summarized as follows.

Management requirements
Section 3 - Terms and definitions (New definitions added)
3.2 Alert / Critical Interval - indicating an immediate risk to the patient of injury or death (equal to Panic Value)
3.8 Interlaboratory Comparison - organization, performance an evaluation of measurements or tests on the same or similar items by two or more laboratories (Included the own laboratory).
3.19 Quality indicator - measure of the degree (e.g. DPMO, CPk)
3.25 turnaround time - two specified points are defined by the laboratory

Section 4.1 - Organization and management responsibility
Additional responsibilities for lab director
4.1.1.4 (h) - select and monitor laboratory suppliers
4.1.1.4 (n) - design and implement a contingency plan & periodically tested
4.1.2.6 - Communication -appropriate communication processes are established between the laboratory and its stakeholders

Section 4.3 - Document control
4.3 (e) - amendments are clearly marked, initiated and dated, and a revised documents is issued within a specified time period
Section 4.4 - Service agreements
4.4.1 - Reference shall be made to any work referred by the laboratory to a referral laboratory or consultant.
Note 3 under 4.4.1 is related to ethics.

Section 4.12 - Continual Improvement
Minor changes in the requirements
- risk assessments to be conducted and improvement plans to be communicated to staff.

Section 4.13 - Control of records
Note 3 - For some records, especially those stored electronically, the safest storage may be on secure media and an offsite location (Backup copy)

Section 4.14 - Evaluation and audits
New requirement
4.14.3 - Assessment of user feedback (already in ISO 17025)
4.14.4 - Staff suggestions
4.14.6 - Risk management
4.14.7 - Quality indicators

Technical requirements
Section 5.2 - Accommodation and environmental conditions
Elaborate requirement on accommodation
- examinations at sites other than the main laboratory premises (e.g. Point-of-care testing (POCT))
- Access control
- Safety facilities and devices (regularly verified)
- Staff facilities (e.g. Washrooms, supply of drinking water, facilities for storage of personal protective equipment and clothing)
- Quiet and uninterrupted work environment

Section 5.3 - Laboratory equipment, reagents and consumables
- Laboratory equipment adverse incident reporting (investigated and reported to the manufacturer and appropriate authorities, as requirement - e.g. CE IVD)

Section 5.4 - Pre-examination process
5.4.4 - Primary sample collection and handling (elaborated requirements on patient consent)
5.4.6 - Sample reception - specify time limit for requesting additional or futher test on the same primary sample

Section 5.5 - Example process
5.5.1.2 - Verification of examination procedures
- validate examination procedures used without modification included FDA approved or CE IVD assays.

Section 5.6 - Ensuring quality of examination results
5.6.3 - Interlaboratory comparisons - Documented procedure for interlaboratory comparison participation

Section 5.9 - Release of results
New requirement
5.9.2 - Automated selection and reporting of results

Section 5.10 - Laboratory Information Management
New requirement
5.10.2 - Authorities and Responsibilities
- Access patient data and information
- Enter and change patient data and result
- Authorize release of results

The third speaker was Dr. Lillian Chow (Accreditation Officer, HKAS) and her presentation was "Changes in HOKLAS Policies in relation to the revised requirements stated in ISO 15189:2012".


Dr. Chow said the changes in HOKLAS policies aimed to clarify and elaborate the new requirements in ISO 15189:2012 in follows.

In 4.1.H, it stated to ensure staff do not work under undue pressure that may affect integrity and quality of work.
In 4.3.H, a revised document shall normally be issued upon its annual review and be paid to controlled documents distributed for use at the branch and mobile facilities.
In 4.5.H, Examination by referral laboratories should be reputable with demonstrated evidence of competency for the referred test.
In 4.7.H, documented communication between the laboratory and the users, and shall be advised on limitations of the tests.
In 5.1.H, Competency assessment included EQAP performance, records of continuing medical education (CME) or continuing professional development (CPD)
In 5.4.H, at least two identifiers of the submitted specimen (One should be name or ID number of the patient) and define a list of time critical tests
In 5.7.H, When samples are disposal of, care shall be taken to protect patient's confidential information.

Dr. Chow said a new clause of 5.10 was come from Annex B (Informative) of ISO 15189:2007. Storage of pa patient database with confidential information on standalone computers with accessibility to internet is not recommended.


Reference:
HKAS - http://www.itc.gov.hk/en/quality/hkas/about.htm


2013年3月22日星期五

Briefing on the New Edition of ISO 15189:2012 Medical Laboratory

The Seminar named "Briefing on the New Edition of the International Standard ISO 15189:2012 Medical Laboratory - Requirement for Quality and Competence" was organized by the Hong Kong Accreditation Service (HKAS) on 21 March 2013. Mr. John James (Convenor, ISO Technical Committee 212 Working Group 1) was the guest speaker.

In the beginning, Mr. John James explained the new edition aimed to keep it up to date and relevant to working practices, including requirements appropriate to genetic testing laboratories. ISO 15189 is a sector-specific variant of ISO/IEC 17025, approved as such by ISO CASCO. It is voluntary to use nationally and regionally. John said the content compared of old and new editions was 90% the same but more "user-friendly" elements added.


In the standard, Annex B - Table B.1 showed the Comparison of ISO 15189:2007 to ISO 15189:2012 and found that more elaborated in the sub-sections.


Then John briefed the relationship of ISO 15189 with ISO/IEC 17025 and ISO 9001. ISO/IEC 17025:2005 is a NORMATIVE REFERENCE in ISO 15189. ISO 9001 is listed in the Bibliography. The management system requirements in ISO 15189 are written in a language relevant to a medical laboratory's operations and meet the principles of ISO 9001:2008 Quality Management Systems - Requirements, and are aligned with its pertinent requirement. Details are in ISO 15189:2012 Annex A.


After that John told us the history of creating ISO 15189. This vision became a Reality in 1994 with ISO Technical Committee for the Medical Laboratory Standards (ISO TC 212) and its first meeting was in May/June 1995. There were experts from 20 countries included Australia, Belgium, Canada, China, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Iran, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Netherlands, New Zealand, Singapore, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom and United States.

The following were summary of Changes to note in the new edition.
i) Normative references (Deleted References to ISO 9001 & ISO 31 and Added ISO/IEC 17000 - Conformity assessment - Vocabulary and general principles)
ii) Some definitions are specific to medical laboratories and had to be defined for the Standard (e.g. Examination, Alert interval, Biological reference interval, etc.)
iii) Section 4 Management Requirements has been substantially re-drafted, importing, for example, “Ethics” as a section rather than being an Annex (now Section 4.1.1.3 “Ethical conduct”)
iv) New sections in 4.1.2.1 to 4.1.2.6, 4.4.1, 4.14.2 to 4.14.8, 5.4.2, 5.4.6,
v) Major addition section was 5.10 - Laboratory Information System

Finally, John summarized that text had been moved to fit contextually, where logic determines in the new edition. Section sub headings helped "user-friendliness" and ISO TC 212 had produced a revised Standard that would contribute to continual improvement in medical laboratory quality and performance.
John mentioned the Internal Auditing and raised several questions for our thinking below.
Why do we need to demonstrate all processes meet the needs & requirements of users?
How do we demonstrate all processes meet the needs & requirements of users?
How do we quantify the observations?

Why do we need to ensure conformity of the QC management system?
How do we ensure conformity of the QC management system?
How do we quantify or codify the observations?

Why do we need to continually improve the effectiveness of the QC system?
How do we continually improve the effectiveness of the QC system?
How do we quantify the observations?


At the end of seminar, John discussed the certification and accreditation. He said this standard was not intended to be used for the purposes of certification but indicated technical competence and consistent delivery of technically valid results. During Accreditation, grading of non-conformities were classified "Very serious indeed", "Quite significant" and "Minor or isolated".

Reference:
HKAS - http://www.itc.gov.hk/en/quality/hkas/about.htm

2011年1月31日星期一

Seminar - The Meaning of Accreditation to Medical Testing

I attended the seminar entitled "The Meaning of Accreditation to Medical Testing" which organized by Hong Kong Council for Testing and Certification (HKCTC) and Hong Kong Accreditation Service (HKAS) on 31 January 2011. I would like to summarize the seminar below for sharing.


Mrs. Marianne Leung (Member of HKCTC) gave an opening remarks. She said accreditation to medical testing was familiar in the west. Eventhough we had doing a good thing but the accreditation could open our mind and improvement our standard continuously.


The first speaker was Ms. Bella Ho (Senior Accreditation Officer, HKAS) and her topic was "Accreditation Service for the Medical Laboratories".


Ms. Ho introduced the background of HKAS. There are three scheme under HKAS included HKCAS, HOKLAS and HKIAS. Then she briefed the international recognition through mutual recognition arrangement (MRA) of ILAC and APLAC, as well as, multilateral recognition arrangement (MLA) of IAF and PAC.


Then she mentioned the structure of HKAS. The following diagram showed the details. She said about 100 assessors for ISO 15189 and around 20 assessors for each field. Ms. Ho questioned us what is accreditation. Then she used a simple terms to explain it as "Accreditation is a formal recognition that an organization is competent to carry out specific task to an acceptable standard".


The history of medical programme for ISO 15189 in Hong Kong was reviewed.


Ms. Ho introduced the accreditation process flow for applying HOKLAS accreditation.


Assessment team constitution included HKAS officer, one pathologist and one scientist for each discipline.


The whole sample analysis cycle included pre-analytical, analytical and post-analytical phase were briefed. All steps should be reviewed during assessment.


Until January 2011, 31 accreditations granted to 86 laboratories. All 13 laboratories were under Department of Health; and the other 52 laboratories were in 13 Hospital under HA. The remaining 21 laboratories were in private sector including 46 collection centres operated by these laboratories and 5 laboratories in 4 private hospitals. The details showed in the following diagram.


The scope of ISO 15189 accreditation in HOKLAS included Anatomical pathology, Chemical pathology, Immunology, Haematology, Microbiology, Molecular genetics and Cytogenetics.


Finally, Ms. Ho concluded that HOKLAS means the commitment to Quality.


The second speaker was Dr. Michael Suen (President of Hong Kong College of Pathologists) and his topic entitled "Laboratory Accreditation - How Useful Is It?"


Dr. Suen briefed the laboratory practice which was separated into Manual Work, Equipment and Automation.


Then he mentioned the quality control practice.


After that he explained how necessary/important of responsibility, Accountability and Liability.
For Responsibility, it was related to the role of Medical Laboratory and Reference Laboratory.
For Accountability, people would ask 'Who', 'What', 'How', 'Why' and 'When', if accident / error appeared.
For Liability, it was a responsiblity according to law (Action leading to Result - Medical Legal).


Dr. Suen shared one of accident investigation case to us. He said that the accreditation of laboratory was very important to show the integrity of result and traceability of the work. The safeguard of quality through accreditation included Document Control, QA Program, Delegation of Duties, Quality Meeting and Safety.


Lastly, Dr. Suen concluded that the accreditation was useful because of the followings: Record Tracing, Push for Quality (Not Guarantee for Quality), Social Consciousness, Management Incentive and Liability Issue.


After tea break, Experience Sharing from Two Accredited Medical Laboratories: Road to Accreditation was started.

Ms. Tam Chung Mei (Laboratory Manager, PathLab Medical Laboratories Ltd.) shared her laboratory accreditation journey.


Firstly, she introduced the background of PathLab Medical Laboratories Ltd.


Then she explained why choose HOKLAS. It was because of Long term cost savings and mutual recognition.


Ms. Tam shared their experience within 2-year preparation time. Getting started the process, a key responsible person was designated. They met problems with old documents. After completed the document control, they needed to prepare technical procedures and processes. Internal Quality Control should be implemented and Proficiency Testing - External Quality Assurance Programs (EQAP) should be participated. The most costly was method validation! Calibration and verification of different equipment (such as Tachometer, Balance, Centrifuge, Pipette, Thermometers, Timer and Autoclave) were must. She assigned two auditors that one was for management system and the other was for technical requirement. Lastly, management and staff meetings were implemented.


Ms. Tam concluded four benefits for accreditation as 'Improved overall efficiency', 'Standardization', 'Improved staff morale' and 'Recognition'.


The last speaker was Mr. Tsang Chun Ho (Laboratory Director, Onco Medical Laboratory Ltd.) and he shared his view on accreditation.


Mr. Tsang briefed his key concept for accreditation was continuous improvement and business sustainability. The most important was Positive Thinking!


Then he introduced Onco Med Lab Ltd services included Pap Smear and Blood Tests.
He said that the most important factors for accreditation was Standard Operation Procedure (SOP) and Staffing.


Mr. Tsang shared the benefits after accreditation below:
l Reduce number of customer complaints, incidents and accidents, as well as error result and number of missing specimens.
l Good Image, Good QC
l Good record system (Traceability)
l Technical development
l Doctors attitude overall were positive to laboratory accreditation


At the end, Mr. Tsang used computer to simulate the relationship of Soft Culture and Accreditation to Continuously Improvement. In additional, he use a famous Chinese sentence to end the talk.
(錢不是萬能, 但沒錢是萬萬不能.) Similar to
(Accreditation不是萬能, 但沒Accreditation是萬萬不能.)

Q&A Session:
There were some questions raised from participants for discussion such as backdated record signature, auditing, staff morale etc.


Reference:
Hong Kong Accreditation Service: http://www.hkas.gov.hk
Hong Kong College of Pathologists: http://www.hkcpath.org/
PathLab Medical Laboratories Ltd.: http://www.pathlabhk.com/
Onco Medical Laboratory Ltd.: http://www.onco.com.hk/

Other related information:
Quality Management for Laboratory Training by HKSQ & CityU: http://www.hksq.org/HKSQ_BCH_2010_11_18_R4.pdf
Certified Laboratory Quality Specialist CLabQS (HKSQ) Registration: http://www.hksq.org/cert_hksq_clabqs.htm
History of Certificate Course on Quality Management for Laboratory:

2010年12月2日星期四

Medical Laboratory QM Training - ISO 15189

I attended the ISO 15189 training organized by HKSA from 29 November to 1 December 2010. The course was performed by New Zealand Quality College which was the training division of International Accreditation New Zealand (IANZ).
The speaker was Ms. Shelli Turner (Programme Manager - Medical Testing, IANZ).


The diagram showed the syllabus of the training course in which included all managerial and technical requirements.


We needed to do a group exercise and presented the results and solutions.


The last day, Ms. Shelli Turner presented the training certificate to us.


For more information:
IANZ - http://www.ianz.govt.nz/
New Zealand Quality College - http://www.nzqc.co.nz/

LinkWithin

Related Posts with Thumbnails