The Executive Study Group (ESG) webinar named “Performance Management – Key
Performance Indicator (KPI) Strategy 2.0” was held by Asia Pacific Institute
for Strategy Limited (APIFS) on 27th Sep 2022. In the beginning, Dr. Mark Lee briefed the
background, history, and goal of Asia Pacific Institute for Strategy Limited
(APIFS). Before the webinar, Dr. Mark Lee surveyed participant and found that
40% employed 1-5 KPIs and 31% used 6-10 KPIs. It is very common tools.
Firstly, Dr. Mark Lee introduced today’s content including KPI’s objective,
five traps, strategy maps and its implementation, as well as, strategic alignment.
He said conventional performance measure of KPI related to financial data. Apart
from financial measures, he briefed some non-financial measures such as
customer loyalty, employee satisfaction, etc.
Then he introduced five traps of KPIs. The first trap is “Not Linking to
Strategy”. Most company employed Kaplan
and Norton’s Balanced Scorecard directly (like copycat) but not focused on
their strategy. Company should dip deep to discover and track the activities so
as to align with their strategy.
The second trap is “Not Validating the Links”. Dr. Lee said even though
you set KPI with link but do you validate the link are effective and right? Sometime
too many KPIs that difficult to manage your business. Moreover, not every KPIs
are equal importance so that we need to assign weightings. Then he surveyed again
and 47% responded KPI is effective.
The third trap is “Not Setting the Right Performance Targets”. KPI
should set to the right target. Customer satisfaction could set upto 100% but
it is not right level to balance. Time should be also considered including
short-term and long-term.
The fourth trap is “Validity and Reliability”. Dr. Lee showed a bias
survey with not even distributed grading that could cause bias. And he quoted Uniqlo
selection rule for promotion idea that advertisement with 60% agree and 40% disagree
by internal vote to be selected. Impressive to customer is Uniqlo strategic
goal.
The last trap is “Sticking to Your Numbers Too Long”. If you have 20
KPIs, it may be too many without weighting to priority. Dr. Lee said KPI should be updated frequency so
as to match the changing environment.
After that Dr. Lee discussed the value of strategy map that provided a
clear line of sight that jobs are linked to the overall objectives of the
organization. The KPI 2.0 is based on balanced scorecard added cause-and-effect
link. The implementation sequency is
considered Customer Perspective first, and then Internal Process Perspective (Time-Horizon:
short-term for improvement and long-term for innovation). Learning and Growth
Perspective followed and considered to be Learning Organization. Lastly,
Financial Perspective would be the outcome after increasing shareholder value.
Finally, he compared the financial measures and non-financial measures.
When KPIs aligned with strategy, gaps can be discovered for effective fine-turn.
At the end, Dr. Mark Lee surveyed about which strategy implementation is
the most difficult. The results were found to be even distribution.
Reference:
Asia Pacific Institute for Strategy Limited (亞太策略研究所有限公司) – www.apifs.org
ESG facebook - https://www.facebook.com/groups/esg08
Previous talks summary:
https://qualityalchemist.blogspot.com/search/label/Executive%20Study%20Group
沒有留言:
發佈留言